• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Shop
Menu

Nick Tauro Jr.

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Shop
QuadCamSmall.jpg

Gear Review: Quad-Cam Film Camera

November 18, 2020

Here’s a gift for all the gear junkies out there. I’m jamming out another camera review!

Hey all you Sony ABc200x shooters! Calling all the Fujifilm fanboys! No, I’m not gonna sway you towards a Ricoh Daido GR5000, or micro 2/3 or 3/4 or 16/18th crop sensor, digital paperweight. I’m talking about a film camera. Not the YouTube, flavor of the month, medium format 6x7, or one of those Hasselblad panos that will cost you your first child. I’m not even drinking the Lomography kool-aid today (though to be fair, that cult saved my life, in the early 00’s, before it was cool to hate on Lomo…) but I digress. I’m going to wax poetic about the craptastic, plastic, 35mm film camera, known to me as the “Quad-Cam.” Damn, they even have one of these gems in the Cooper Hewitt / Smithsonian Design Museum, so you know it’s legit.

I wish I could tell you the technical specs of this wonder of post-modern technology, but the model I own did not come with much details. So instead, I’ll share some info I cribbed from an eBay post (apologies to whomever this is lifted from…)

The camera takes four consecutive pictures on a 24x36mm negative as the shutter spins round like clockwork. With fixed focus and shutter speed (about one second in total, so 1/4 second for each shot) and aperture. Pictures with four images taken after one another can be great fun. It works especially well with frantically moving people or sports. The shutter is a small plastic rotating disc placed behind the lenses. This disc has one small opening and in combination with the four light chambers, it gives four exposures. The Camera has four 26mm f/11 lenses and that everything from 1.2m to infinity is in focus. The shutter speed is set at 1/100s with .22 second intervals between each frame. The film advance is a thumb wheel cog. When loaded with film this also cocks the shutter. The camera has a small frame counter in the bottom that is automatically reset when you open the back. Pictures are composed through a folding frame finder on top.

Yada, yada, yada… all this info kind of goes out the window when you shoot with this camera. The only thing you have control over is 1) choice of film; and 2) where you point this thing. I found (PRO TIP) that ASA 100 film seems to work best, at least in this gorgeous New Mexico daylight. You might want to use ASA 200 or 400 if you live in a less-bright environment. My roll of ASA 400 was horribly overexposed. The sequence of exposures moves pretty quickly, so I would suggest moving the camera while you shoot, if you are shooting a non-moving subject… at least you’ll get four slightly different images on each frame of film. If you are shooting moving subjects, try not to move at all, and let the camera spin its magic. I really wish there was more control over the speed of the four exposures.

So, on to the results. There is something I really like about the grouping of four images on one standard 35mm frame. The image quality is surprisingly better than expected, from a shitty, fixed focus, plastic lens. I got some really nice results shooting directly towards the sun, where a nice blast of lens flare crept into a fe frames. I also enjoyed the reckless abandon of not even trying to frame up my shots. Just point and shoot, like God intended. I also like being able to hack the camera, by placing a finger or two over some of the lenses, resulting in a frame that has one or two images missing from the frame. Scan a few of these frames in a row and you have a geometric study in randomness.

View fullsize QuadBlog-8.jpg
View fullsize QuadBlog-7.jpg
View fullsize QuadBlog-6.jpg
View fullsize QuadBlog-5.jpg
View fullsize QuadBlog-4.jpg
View fullsize QuadBlog-3.jpg
View fullsize QuadBlog-2.jpg
View fullsize QuadBlog.jpg

My conclusions, and you may not agree… spend the 5 to 10 bucks on eBay and snag one of these cameras and try it out. Chances are it will probably break sooner than later, but in the meantime, it will free you up of any ideas of control and predictability. It will most likely disappoint you more often than not. It may also blindside you with wonder and surprise… and magical, fleeting joy. Just like life.


In camera review Tags gear, plastic camera, quad-cam, lomography, film photography, shoot film, existentialism, chance
Comment
FilmScraped.JPG

2020: 22 (Rejection)

May 30, 2020

Over the past few months, I’ve spent the majority of my time shooting film. I have described the appeal in other blog posts, but I have come to deeply appreciate the imperfections that film shooting accentuates. My journey through film has included a number of “hacks” that entail running 35mm film through medium format cameras, or shooting with an array of cheap, plastic cameras. Developing black and white film in my kitchen sink has allowed me a closed loop on my image production, and it has liberated me from the constraints of the “perfect” image.

Digital cameras have created so many opportunities for capturing images that in the past would have been impossible (or extremely challenging) to achieve with film. However, with all of the technological advances has come a plethora of similarity. Perfectly exposed, perfectly stopped action, perfect, perfect, perfect. Ultra fast shutter speeds and rapid frame-per-second rates have exacerbated the “spray and pray” approach to digital shooting. With all of this comes boring sameness. Social media has already made each image almost instantly disposable, and a scan through my Instagram feed reinforces the easy dismissal of what might even be an outstanding individual photograph. It all just gets lost in the deluge.

Strip.jpg

Maybe it’s the acceptance of living in a “new reality” (how I hate that term) that has pushed me further away from conventional thinking, or maybe I’ve watched too many YouTube videos of “influencers’ testing out lenses and cameras, or even different film stocks. It all merges into white noise of sameness, mediocrity, a general lack of originality. I have been embracing the crudeness of film shooting, the limits of sharpness, the beauty of film grain, the roughness of film sprocket holes, blasted out highlights and undetailed shadows. Image quality that reflects the world as it is right now. Turmoil and upheaval and unfairness, and bigotry, and violence, and selfishness… and death. Pain washes over all of us in time, as the maestro Robert Frank once said… fitting that it has crept into my image making. But this is not all doom and gloom thinking and creating, as I find the entire process to be cathartic, and ultimately, life affirming. I realize that I have my own way of seeing the world, and my own way of showing the world. And yes, sometimes that’s a dark vision, but sometimes there is a light in the darkness, and sometimes it just feels good to exorcise some ghosts that rattle in the depths of my mind.

I often quote Henri Cartier-Bresson’s statement that “sharpness is a bourgeois concept.” I am empowered to reject the expectation of clarity, sharpness, cleanliness and perfection. I have published a number of zines under the masthead “Flaunt The Imperfections” and it is in this spirit that my most recent work has evolved. Real life isn’t perfect… why should my art be any different?

In film photography, thoughts Tags thoughts, robert frank, film photography, plastic camera, flaunt the imperfections
Comment

2020: 20 (The Future Is Unpredictable)

May 16, 2020

I have been going pretty deep into an experimental stage with my photography as of late. Maybe it’s the fucked up reality we are living through, but I have felt a creative liberation of sorts. Whether it’s taping a pinhole lens onto my dSLR, or shooting with plastic cameras, it has helped me find a release from the pendulum swings between boredom and anxiety.

Recently I shot with a Holga camera, even choosing to run a roll of 35mm film through it, to further push myself away from predictability. This week I took it one step further, digging out an old Diana clone (a Windsor, precisely) which is an even cruder, plastic camera that takes 120 film. The Diana and its clones have an almost mythical reputation among film photographers, and as you can see from the contact sheet above, it lives up to its reputation.

Maybe I’ve been on a lucky streak lately, or maybe I’ve finally learned from numerous past mistakes, but the results I’ve been getting with these cameras have been very satisfying. I think I have finally figured out the correct combination of film speed, focus setting, and of course, using copious amounts of black gaffer tape to control light leaks. What I enjoy most about shooting with these cameras is the unpredictability of it all. I honestly don’t know when the roll begins and ends, since I tape over the film counter window, so I arbitrarily lose a shot or two at the start and end of each roll. Framing and composition is a guessing game, as is exposure. But that is where the magic truly lies. Pulling a roll of just-developed film from the processing tank is always a wonderful moment of surprise. As long as there is some kind of image appearing, I consider the whole exercise a success.

Perhaps the unpredictability of shooting film in this manner is the perfect metaphor for our current times, and I am grateful for the possibility of some magical moments to occur.

In film photography, thoughts Tags film photography, plastic camera, diana, holga
Comment